It's a small step, but I'll take it! I paid for a "Feature Script Premium Development Notes From an Executive (2 Pages)" - and the feedback arrived - and while it's a pass, my script apparently doesn't stink! (I'm in Huntsville, Alabama so I speak fluent nerd, but I'm new to this screenwriting stuff, so please double-check me.) Here's some of the comments:
Mike Hardware, Private Eye
Logline:
A face-blind private eye and his sharp new assistant investigate a Nazi-era murder tied to their nightmare client's bitter divorce, only to discover a killer determined to frame her for it.
Nutshell:
Based on the tone and structure, comps for this film are: KNIVES OUT with the quirks of MONK or PSYCH
Comment Summary:
I really enjoyed this read! The writer's comedic voice felt distinctive and well-sustained throughout the script. I never felt like the comedy or jokes were forced or unnecessary. The dog was also a great comedic touch, especially with his own commentary in Mike's imagination. A lot of the comedy was able to further the characters' development (like the M&Ms or toilet paper quirks) vs there just as a gag. The mystery was well put together with clues sprinkled in early so the audience is kept on their toes without even knowing it! The conclusion felt earned, especially after suspecting each character along the way. Thank you so much for letting me review the material.
Formatting:
This is a really well-formatted script that was easily read and enjoyed!
Concept & Originality:
I think this is a strong and well-executed concept with real commercial appeal. The core hook is a good combination because each piece earns its place rather than just being quirky for a comedy sake. The face blindness isn't just a gimmick slapped on for fun, but a solid justification for Kaye's role as well as creating real stakes for Mike. The dog isn't just comic relief, but an underlying commentary moving the plot forward.
My instinct here is that the concept feels like a TV pilot vs a full length feature. The episodic (and almost procedural) structure and the ensemble of recurring characters feels more like a recurring cast more than a standalong movie. While this isn't a flaw, it does beg the question on if this makes more sense as a TV show than a feature. I will also mention that the tone is doing a tricky balance between the high stakes of a murder mystery with the low stakes of a slow burn romance. It's hard to strike this balance just right without the comedy undercutting the stakes of something as serious as a murder. I actually believe the writer has done a great job of achieving this, but just something to note.
Character & Dialogue:
The character work in this script is great! Mike is a really well built lead. He has a distinct inner voice without making him a stock character. He's calm under pressure and morally grounded. The dog is such a fun character and giving him a real personality as the "senior partner" was such a smart inclusion. Kaye has a great arc packed into a short amount of time and gives us the ultimate clue that cracks the case.
Some actor ideas for making a visual deck:
Mike - Jake Lacy, Charlie Day, Ben Schwartz Kaye - Kiersey Clemons, Betty Gilpin
Ms. Perriman - Jane Lynch
Plot & Structure:
Your plot plays really fair. The mystery is built carefully with real planning and believable red herrings before landing on the real killer. The script will reward attentive audiences and hold up with critical scrutiny which is the hardest thing to pull off for mystery-comedies.
Budget & Commercial Prospect:
Budget-wise, this script is a very achievable indie feature likely in the -3 Million range. A reasonably recognizable cast can be achieved here even on a small budget with many of the locations/settings being practical vs built. There weren't any major stunts or visual effects necessities which will also keep costs low. The only pricey elements I noticed were the animated dream sequences which will require extra work and clear boundaries for how lavish they are.
DEVELOPMENT
Writer: Pass Project: Pass
Next Steps:
It's always a good idea to look into reputable (keywork reputable!) writing contests like Austin Film Festival, Nicholl Fellowship, or genre-specific comedy competitions that could build credibility and get it in front of industry readers. Please be wary of competitions that are just trying to take your money. These are a waste of time and materials. I also suggest filming a sizzle reel or short film version of this and uploading to YouTube/TikTok to convey a proof of concept in tone, character, and comedy.
Next, you should do a deep dive with a Character Voice Pass. Read the script aloud, or stage a table read with friends, so you can hear the dialogue in real-time and how each character expresses themselves. Because this ensemble is large, it’s important to make sure the dialogue belongs fully to each individual character without being interchangeable. You don’t want voices to bleed together in these larger and more chaotic group scenes.
3 people like this
solid feedback - love to see it! are you gonna take the notes up on making a Tik Tok proof of concept?
4 people like this
I am so green at this stuff. I have never used Tik Tok and have no idea how to do that.
4 people like this
Eddie, congratulations on taking the first steps on your screenwriting journey! - That is some good feedback. -I was given the same feedback on reading it out loud. My other major feedback was “it’s too wordy”! — I am new to the script writing process, how I have written for other projects. - I would say, DO NOT waste your time or money creating a sizzle reel (been there done that). - Focus your time and energy on your rewrite, and if you have money you can hire a writer to help with same. - Then get back on here and join the pitch nights, learn how to pitch, and look for a manager to rep you.
It is almost impossible to find a rep or manager. - (notice I didn’t write agent, they are totally impossible to find).
Best of luck,
JD
4 people like this
Eddie. Good feedback is so hard to find. I have engaged many coverage services, from Stage 32, Score Scripts, Bulletproof and more. The best I have had is by far a Development Dossier from Screenwriting Staffing. I expected 10 pages of notes but received approximately 40 pages of detailed notes for each script. It's a little pricey, I think about $150 per script, but the turnaround was amazingly fast, (like a week) and the notes were quite specific and were extremely helpful. I don't work for them, and have no interest in the company at all, but I was impressed and with those notes, I have been able to really improve my screenplays.
3 people like this
That’s far more than “it doesn’t stink” there’s some genuinely strong feedback here, especially on concept, character, and commercial potential. Congrats, Eddie! Sounds like Mike Hardware, Private Eye has real personality and a solid foundation.
2 people like this
That’s a very encouraging “pass,” Eddie. When the reader is praising the concept, character work, mystery structure, dialogue, and commercial potential, there’s clearly something strong on the page. The TV-series observation is especially interesting sometimes feedback like that can reveal an even bigger opportunity than the original format.
3 people like this
Well done Eddie Lawhorn !!! Very positive feedback.
1 person likes this
Hey, Eddie Lawhorn. You're new to screenwriting, so this is really impressive! Congratulations! Private Eye sounds interesting! Incredible feedback! It sounds like you're really close to a solid script. Also, Alabama or Auburn?
4 people like this
This advice is something people who are serious about their craft need to embrace: you should never , I repeat never, pay someone to read your writing. If you are paying for any type of submission, it is vanity press -level at best and a scam, at its worst. This site has gone to heck with all the paid service stuff and fake accounts.
2 people like this
Thanks for the encouragement everyone! Now that I have a novel, screenplay, and gameshow out of this project so far, I might as well go ahead and figure out how to do the TV version next. I can’t afford any more paid reviews, but if anyone would like to read it, I would be glad to have another set of eyes look it over. I would also be glad to read yours and offer any feedback, as long as you don’t mind comments from a newbie. :) Oh, and I am a heretic in Alabama. Go Vols!
1 person likes this
You're welcome, Eddie Lawhorn. Keep us posted on your project. I don't have anything to script swap with you right now, but maybe in the future. Roll Tide!
2 people like this
What Aimee said.
2 people like this
David Taylor, that's my line. What Aimee Conner said.