Director of Photography/VFX Artist at WinterLight Studios♦ Cinematographer, Camera Operator, Compositor, Gaffer/Lighting Technician, Visual Effects Artist
Everyone is more collectively intentional about what makes it on screen. The moment feels more precious and less thrown away when the camera is rolling.
Rakesh Malik, for me, what I miss most is how intentional every single decision had to be. When I was in film school, we weren’t allowed to touch a digital camera during our first semester. We had to shoot on classic Bolex film cameras, which meant every second of film mattered because once you ran out, that was it. There was no “let’s just do one more take.”
It forced us to storyboard carefully, rehearse, and really think through our coverage before we rolled the camera. We also had to edit in-camera and then wait for the film to be developed before we even knew whether we’d captured what we intended. There was something both nerve-racking and exciting about that process. On top of that, we were graded on whether our stories were clear without sound or dialogue. That exercise completely changed the way I think about visual storytelling. It taught me to ask, “Can the audience understand this just by watching?”
Digital filmmaking has given us incredible creative freedom, and I certainly appreciate that. But I do think there’s something valuable about the discipline film demanded. Sometimes limitations are exactly what make us better storytellers.
The responses here echo my own opinions; what I miss most about using film is the discipline in filmmaking, and along with sacrificing the discipline, many filmmakers who began after the digital revolution also eschew planning, because they mistakenly believe that planning impedes their creativity.
Totally agree with Ashley Renée Smith about there being a lot more intentionality about every shot, especially on low budget shoots. You rarely now get movies where you get that "every frame is a painting" feeling and creative use of depth and blocking for longer takes. Yes it is good that we don't have to worry about a lot of things with digital but there is still something to be said about the creative problem solving that happens when you know you only have a few hundred feet of stock!
5 people like this
The discipline. Knowing what the shot is, the blocking for both actor(s) and camera, and knowing you have a limited amount of film to do it.
4 people like this
Everyone is more collectively intentional about what makes it on screen. The moment feels more precious and less thrown away when the camera is rolling.
3 people like this
Rakesh Malik, for me, what I miss most is how intentional every single decision had to be. When I was in film school, we weren’t allowed to touch a digital camera during our first semester. We had to shoot on classic Bolex film cameras, which meant every second of film mattered because once you ran out, that was it. There was no “let’s just do one more take.”
It forced us to storyboard carefully, rehearse, and really think through our coverage before we rolled the camera. We also had to edit in-camera and then wait for the film to be developed before we even knew whether we’d captured what we intended. There was something both nerve-racking and exciting about that process. On top of that, we were graded on whether our stories were clear without sound or dialogue. That exercise completely changed the way I think about visual storytelling. It taught me to ask, “Can the audience understand this just by watching?”
Digital filmmaking has given us incredible creative freedom, and I certainly appreciate that. But I do think there’s something valuable about the discipline film demanded. Sometimes limitations are exactly what make us better storytellers.
4 people like this
The responses here echo my own opinions; what I miss most about using film is the discipline in filmmaking, and along with sacrificing the discipline, many filmmakers who began after the digital revolution also eschew planning, because they mistakenly believe that planning impedes their creativity.
3 people like this
That's a great way to put it Rakesh Malik .
1 person likes this
I miss the gels. Lighting meticulously with gels. The way the light just looks different on film. The only time I use clothes pins now is for laundry.
1 person likes this
Totally agree with Ashley Renée Smith about there being a lot more intentionality about every shot, especially on low budget shoots. You rarely now get movies where you get that "every frame is a painting" feeling and creative use of depth and blocking for longer takes. Yes it is good that we don't have to worry about a lot of things with digital but there is still something to be said about the creative problem solving that happens when you know you only have a few hundred feet of stock!